‘That is, can be both a union and a particle. As an union, for example: ‘I would like to start my notes from the nineteenth of September last year, that is, from that day …’ (Dostoevsky);Like a particle: ‘gnomes? – I was surprised. – That is?’.
It is written in all cases exclusively separately.
How to write ‘that is’ or ‘that is,’ does not depend on what part of the speech it is. This word Always written separately Regardless of a particle or union, it is. You can give several suitable examples for clarity.
‘–We will not go for a walk today!
–That is How do we not go?’
‘-Today on the street is bad weather, that is To go for a walk, you need to get warm.’
In these examples, the phrase ‘that is, “manifests itself in different ways, but is always written separately. Although, if you look at the school notebooks of my 13 -year -old nephew…
They use an explanatory union when they want to explain, explain more accurately and practically. How to remember forever, as the explanatory union is written ‘that is, “separately or together? ‘That is,’ is always written separately and if you always forget this, then try to remember this in such a poetic form: ‘that is, ”explains deliciously and is written separately. I hope that you will help you remember this forever.
Of course the word ‘that is,’ is written separately.
There are many such examples in the Russian language. For example ‘since’ or ‘that is,.
These unions are always written separately.
Many even think that ‘that is, is written through – (that is, this is also not correct.
Write correctly separately: that is. Due to the fact that they often reduce, they probably forget (or do not know), as it is written in full. That is – particle and union. Regardless of its functions and positions, it is always written separately.
That is – it is written separately. If the union, then explains or clarifies anything.
And when a particle, it gives the proposal an emotional appearance.
Still studying at school, I just remembered that ‘that is,’ is written separately. ‘That is’, as far as I know, is an union and belongs to official words. And in literary texts, the union ‘that is, can meet in an abbreviated form – t. e. And so (t. e. ) would not be reduced if the ‘that is’ was written together.
‘That is’ is the official part of the speech that connects simple sentences in complex, t.e. This part of speech is a union, and this Composite alliance. This part of speech, always in any context It is written separately.
Moreover, the union ‘i.e.’ can be reduced in the text to ‘t.e.’.
‘That is’ – this is an integral (repeated) compositional union – the service part of the speech that connects the members of the sentence or equal simple sentences in the complex.
It is not difficult to remember the rule of writing this union – that is, in all cases is written separately.
The word that is, is always written separately. This must be remembered once and for all.
It can still be reduced to two letters T. e.
That is – this is an explanatory union.
And he takes the origin with two words, this is the verb ‘is’ and the index pronoun’.
THAT IS (apart)
It is always written separately, “that is” is an explanatory compound union, as well as ‘since’ or ‘namely’. In the sentence, such unions serve to clarify and clarify any information.
From the school course of the Russian language, we know that ‘that is,’ is written separately. ‘That is, can be both a union and a particle. This expression is used for a bunch of words and can relate to ‘parasitic words’.
‘That is,’ is always written separately. And no exceptions from this rule. Belongs to the explanatory union. Has a reduction in spelling: ‘t.e.’. And in colloquial speech you can use: ‘that is,.
This is in my opinion 2 particles….And it is written separately